Categories
Golf Golfmetrics Review

Golfmetrics Review (the New Version): Not Recommended

A few years ago, I had just read Every Shot Counts, I had listened to several interviews Mark Broadie gave, and I was all in on strokes gained. This. I thought to myself. This is what will finally take my game over the edge. This is the data I need. I downloaded the original Golfmetrics app that computes your personal strokes gained against a standard scratch golfer, and I dutifully used it on nearly every round of golf I played.

For your shots, the original Golfmetrics app required you to input your distance from the hole and where you were on the course (tee, fairway, rough, deep rough, recovery, green). And it would remember courses so that you didn’t always have to input the hole’s total yardage off the tee if the tees were typically in the same place. The original Golfmetrics was intuitive and easy to use. It would generate reports based on your last round or last x rounds, and you could easily pull up a list of your rounds from newest to oldest. I liked it, and when watching golf and hearing talk of strokes gained, I felt in the know. I felt like I was using the correct tool to gauge my game. Total putts for the round? Fairways hit? Go back to the ’90’s, bro. We need proximity to the hole information, and we now know that all holed putts are not the same. (Though I still have a soft spot for greens in regulation as a stat. If you’re hitting greens, good things usually follow.)

I reported my rounds on the original Golfmetrics app for four years. Then, this past spring, I got an e-mail that a major update was coming and exciting changes were on the way. I didn’t pay too much attention. Then at some point in the summer, the app automatically updated to the new version.

An early warning sign was that I couldn’t log in. After exchanging a few e-mails with customer support, I got in and immediately started using the new app. I was initially impressed with the GPS map of the course and quickly was able to drag the arrow-shaped icon to where my first shot ended up. You can even set a target and get the distance to the target. But when I got to the green, things changed. That’s when the new app lost its luster. And even after multiple uses, I have not been able to embrace it.

Aside from the fairly expensive $99/year or $9.99/month price (up from around $69/year previously), there are three main things I dislike about the app. One, on the green, the app can be confusing, and it is cumbersome to enter your putts and the pin location, particularly in advanced putting mode. Two, there is a “Plays Like” feature that appears automatically and cannot be turned off. This is like having a slope feature on a rangefinder that stays on permanently; it is a violation of the Rules of Golf and unnecessary. Finally, the reports–a feature I used to enjoy–do not display as many stats as the old version and some of the stats are clearly incorrect.

In the picture at the top, you can see the screen that appears once you enter a shot on the green. It seems easy enough–either mark that you missed; you holed out; or you missed, then made the next one. When I first started using it, I accidentally marked that I had holed out on a hole. No big deal, right? Wrong, at times when I have used the app, once I have advanced to the next hole, I could not go back and edit a hole until I had marked the round complete. This happened a couple of times, and it had me flummoxed. It was distracting, and I had to abandon the app mid-round a few times. I believe the mid-round editing ability has been corrected, and even though I have gotten the hang of entering shots on the green, I still don’t love the app. If you use your GPS location, you have to first manually move the pin icon, and it can be tricky to set the distance of your putt accurately and quickly.

Prior to reaching the green, the new version is definitely better than the old–you just drag the arrow to where you are in the GPS. But on the green, I much prefer just entering that I had a 30-footer followed by a 2-footer. The dragging of the arrow and the constant popping up of the miss/hole out/miss, hole out next screen is annoying. You can also choose to enter advanced putting stats like uphill/left-to-right/misread, etc, but these are awkward and time consuming to deal with (see the screenshot below) on the green and/or on the next tee when you need to be getting ready to hit.

“Plays Like” is another bad feature in the new version of the app. Did Mark Broadie sell the app? I don’t see him wanting a feature like this. In the screenshot below, the “Plays Like” area below the distance information shows an estimate for what the distance will play like, apparently taking into account wind, temperature, and even humidity. I have covered this here and here, but you can’t use wind or slope information under the Rules of Golf. It is a violation of Rule 4.3(a)(1). I don’t think you can turn this feature off in Golfmetrics. Hence, if you want to track your strokes gained stats in a tournament (or simply play by the Rules in a casual round), you are out of luck. At the very least, this feature should be optional for each round.

Finally, the reports are also better in the original version. As late as last week, when I looked at average pars, birdies, bogeys, and doubles made, no matter what I shot, it would be 0.3 or 0.7 or some other number for all four categories. This glitch appears to have been corrected, but it makes me distrust the whole system. The new app also eliminated some stats that I used to enjoy. No longer does a performance report provide a page like this:

I particularly enjoyed the proximity-to-hole stats and the percentage comparisons to a scratch golfer. One other annoying display feature is that your most recent rounds are not shown chronologically, but are grouped by course and then chronologically, so you can’t just see a simple list of your most recent rounds amongst various courses.

Despite the GPS improvements, the drawbacks of the new Golfmetrics app coupled with the boosted price have caused me to end my subscription. I am going to go forward for the time being either using no stats or going back to the old school Y/N on the scorecard row titled GIR.

Note: Golftaco gets a commission if you buy Every Shot Counts using this link. I highly recommend reading Broadie’s book.

Categories
Bandon Dunes Golf Golf Travel--Bandon Travel

Bandon Day 2

Bandon Dunes No. 4 green

Sunday morning we woke up with the excitement and anticipation of a 36-hole day. Sheep Ranch followed by Bandon Dunes. The weather was perfect. It was cool in the morning, and there wasn’t too much wind.

We drove to the Sheep Ranch clubhouse, which is a good ways away from Lily Pond. On the way, you pass the main Bandon Lodge, Pacific Dunes, the Practice Center, and Old Macdonald.

There is a lot of commentary online about the order in which Bandon’s courses should be played. I’m not sure we had much of a choice, but Sheep Ranch was a wonderful start to the trip. It is wide open and very playable–you can get away with some loose shots here and there and still not make blowup-type numbers. I loved Sheep Ranch. The drone footage of Sheep Ranch on the Bandon website is incredible. It is the newest course at Bandon, and it has a mythological origin story. Mike Keiser and Phil Friedmann originally built it seemingly almost as a hobby or side project, then Coore and Crenshaw refined it, and it opened in 2020. One of the caddies said that it was called Sheep Ranch because someone told Mike Keiser that if he built a golf course on this property, it would become nothing but a sheep ranch. I haven’t read that anywhere else, but it sounds good.

Categories
Bandon Dunes Golf Golf Travel--Bandon Travel

Bandon Dunes!

Bandon Preserve

I feel like I have returned from a religious pilgrimage for serious U.S. golfers. Bandon Dunes. Remote Southwest Oregon. Only golfers seem to know about it–I’ve mentioned the name to friends and family and get somewhat blank stares in return. Mentioning Bandon around other golfers, however, evokes hushed, slightly jealous responses like, “Ohhh, okay” [head nodding] and “Hmmm, cool.” If they have been, they know, and they are calculating several things all at once, like how does he get to do this, who is he going with. And if they haven’t been, they’re probably thinking, just what is Bandon, again? Well, Bandon is fantastic and fun and overwhelming all at once. Return trips are definitely a necessity.

Going into the trip, I feel like I did more than your average amount of research. I heard and read a lot about the difficulty in getting there, the size of the property, the purity of golf (no carts!), and, of course, the golf course architecture. After returning home, I feel like I just barely scratched the surface. This will be the first of a few posts on Bandon. I have a lot of thoughts on the subject now.

Categories
Equipment Golf Rangefinders

Precision Pro Rangefinder Review: NX10 Slope versus R1 Smart Rangefinder

Earlier, I wrote how I went about deciding to purchase Precision Pro’s R1 Smart Rangefinder. I played six rounds with the R1. The laser shots are great–quick, accurate reads, with a vibrating buzz confirmation. The smart features–giving front-of-the-green and back-of-the-green numbers in the viewfinder–are just okay.

Ultimately, I sent the R1 back under Precision Pro’s 90-day return policy because the R1 runs the risk of not complying with the Rules of Golf even when the slope switch is off. This is detailed below.

Categories
Golf Golf TV--Good for Your Game?

Can Watching a Featured Group for 18 Holes on TV Help Your Game?

I’ve spent a lot of time watching golf today. Both Shane Bacon and Scott Van Pelt said that the first round of the Masters is the best day of the year for golf. I agree. I’ve been thinking about the Masters for a few weeks, and I was excited this morning. It’s the best day of the golfing year because it’s the first day of the first major of the year; because the golf course looks perfect; because the holes of Augusta National’s back nine are familiar and comforting; because watching the Masters causes many of us to think about our fathers; because the sounds of those birds in those trees evoke a particular feeling; and because it’s the coolest golf tournament that has ever been imagined and the one nearly every pro wants to win more than any other. Plus there’s the LIV storyline and that lady behind the tee at 16 is back (see below).

I set out to watch the Woods/Hovland/Schauffele grouping. It was an ESPN featured group and also appeared on Masters.com. My goal was to see what I could learn after watching every shot of one group for 18 holes. After a couple of holes, ESPN also followed the Rahm/Thomas/Young group. So I ended up watching essentially every shot that six players hit in the first round of the 2023 Masters. Here’s how it went.

Categories
Books Golf Phil by Alan Shipnuck

Review of Phil: The Rip-Roaring (and Unauthorized!) Biography of Golf’s Most Colorful Superstar

Why read a biography of Phil Mickelson? I have read a lot of golf books over the years, but maybe no golf biographies. I was drawn to this one because Phil is interesting–partly because of his outspokenness, partly his flamboyance and gutsiness, and, of course, partly because he is the highest-profile player to sign with LIV Golf. And after reading this book, I came to the conclusion that Phil’s decision to sign with LIV was primarily about money.

Most golf fans already know a lot about Phil Mickelson. Many, many victories, six of which are majors; risk-taking player; never won the U.S. Open; values his wife Amy and family. Alan Shipnuck’s biography Phil is fun to read, mainly through reliving Phil’s extraordinary golf accomplishments. His win at the U.S. Amateur; his first PGA Tour victory while a junior at ASU; his first Masters win in 2004, where he went five under on the last seven and canned the putt on 18, jumping up with fists and putter raised; his duel with Henrik Stenson in 2016 at Troon; his many second place U.S. Open finishes; his incredible history with the Ryder Cup (including the 2014 press conference in which he blasted captain Tom Watson and which probably led to many positive changes for the U.S. Ryder Cup team); and his amazing 2021 PGA Championship victory at 50. (I highly recommend looking up some of the older telecasts online, particularly the Pinehurst U.S. Open (Payne Stewart putt) and the Winged Foot U.S. Open (“I’m such an idiot.”).) There are also some junior, high school, and college golf stories that most probably don’t know, including his concession of a 40-foot putt at the U.S. Amateur.

Beyond the golf facts, though, this book gives you some insight into the inner workings of Phil’s mind. As Shipnuck describes Phil, he always has to be the smartest person in the room; he is never shy about expressing an opinion; he can be very calculating in choosing when and to which reporters he speaks; and he loves to gamble, at golf, on sports games, seemingly anything.

Categories
Equipment Golf Rangefinders

Here’s How I Went About Finding a New Rangefinder

This is old.

My current rangefinder is from the Obama years. It is the Bushnell Tour V2 and has served me well until recently when it started not finding pins and giving me readings from around the green of hundreds of yards out. I would get numbers from the SkyCaddie app on my phone when this happened, but there are many times on the range and on the course where a rangefinder and an exact number are crucial. It is time for a new one.

Thoughts I had going in were these: my old rangefinder had a strange CR2 3V battery. It would be nice to have a AA or AAA situation or rechargeable finder.

I play in a handful of stroke-play events or qualifiers each year, plus I play by the Rules of Golf even when not in a tournament. I wanted to double-check the rules on rangefinders that measure slope so that I didn’t accidentally buy an illegal rangefinder.

I usually walk when I play. I want a rangefinder that has a good case that hangs on the bag and that is secure so that the rangefinder won’t fall out.

Finally, I want to spend around $300. I’ll spend more, but that’s the goal. Spending $300ish seems appropriate for some reason, but $600 and you’re thinking, I could have a new driver for this. And the new driver will be a lot more fun.

Here’s what I learned:

Categories
Golf Golfer's Journal Review

Review of The Golfer’s Journal

I first saw The Golfer’s Journal behind a glass case in Golf Galaxy; there was a stack of about six issues with an intriguing cover photograph showing at the top. I had never heard of it. It seemed confidential; my interest was piqued.

I didn’t buy it then, but months later, I thought of it, went online, and found a video they produced around the time of the U.S. Open at Torrey Pines. The video is about Mission Bay Golf Course, a par-58 short course in San Diego. The video contains a lot of the elements of golf courses that I love. These are features we all know, and features that still draw me in–the low-slung wooden clubhouse, the well-kept municipal course that draws quality players, and one of my favorites–the unassuming guy who doesn’t look the part, but who is really good.

I also saw that Tom Coyne was involved with TGJ, as the magazine refers to itself. I read one of Coyne’s books, Paper Tiger, about his attempt to drop everything and become a professional golfer. I enjoyed it. On the merits of the video and the memory of the glass case and Coyne’s involvement, I became a subscriber of the magazine. I have received two issues so far (I just received issue No. 18 in the mail the other day).

There is a certain mystique to TGJ. The issues aren’t sent out bare or in a simple plastic sleeve as some magazines are–they arrive in their own protective paperboard envelope. To call it a magazine is underselling it, it has more of the feel of an academic journal or trade publication. I get excited when I see it in the mail. The issues have an elegant feel with thick paper and quality binding. When I first get an issue, I flip through and am interested in reading nearly every article.

A subscription is fairly expensive–$75 for four issues a year. The high price is likely due to the limited number of ads that are in the magazine. But the photography alone is worth the price; it is stunning. Each issue has many full-page and double-page spreads of golf scenes from around the world. And as with the Mission Bay video, they incorporate a lot of panoramic drone photographs that are incredible.